第68章 Part 5(14)

In our parish of Aldgate the dead-carts were several times,as I have heard,found standing at the churchyard gate full of dead bodies,but neither bellman or driver or any one else with it;neither in these or many other cases did they know what bodies they had in their cart,for sometimes they were let down with ropes out of balconies and out of windows,and sometimes the bearers brought them to the cart,sometimes other people;nor,as the men themselves said,did they trouble themselves to keep any account of the numbers.

The vigilance of the magistrates was now put to the utmost trial -and,it must be confessed,can never be enough acknowledged on this occasion also;whatever expense or trouble they were at,two things were never neglected in the city or suburbs either :-(1)Provisions were always to be had in full plenty,and the price not much raised neither,hardly worth speaking.

(2)No dead bodies lay unburied or uncovered;and if one walked from one end of the city to another,no funeral or sign of it was to be seen in the daytime,except a little,as I have said above,in the three first weeks in September.

This last article perhaps will hardly be believed when some accounts which others have published since that shall be seen,wherein they say that the dead lay unburied,which I am assured was utterly false;at least,if it had been anywhere so,it must have been in houses where the living were gone from the dead (having found means,as I have observed,to escape)and where no notice was given to the officers.All which amounts to nothing at all in the case in hand;for this I am positive in,having myself been employed a little in the direction of that part in the parish in which I lived,and where as great a desolation was made in proportion to the number of inhabitants as was anywhere;I say,I am sure that there were no dead bodies remained unburied;that is to say,none that the proper officers knew of;none for want of people to carry them off,and buriers to put them into the ground and cover them;and this is sufficient to the argument;for what might lie in houses and holes,as in Moses and Aaron Alley,is nothing;for it is most certain they were buried as soon as they were found.As to the first article (namely,of provisions,the scarcity or dearness),though I have mentioned it before and shall speak of it again,yet I must observe here:-(1)The price of bread in particular was not much raised;for in the beginning of the year,viz.,in the first week in March,the penny wheaten loaf was ten ounces and a half;and in the height of the contagion it was to be had at nine ounces and a half,and never dearer,no,not all that season.And about the beginning of November it was sold ten ounces and a half again;the like of which,I believe,was never heard of in any city,under so dreadful a visitation,before.

(2)Neither was there (which I wondered much at)any want of bakers or ovens kept open to supply the people with the bread;but this was indeed alleged by some families,viz.,that their maidservants,going to the bakehouses with their dough to be baked,which was then the custom,sometimes came home with the sickness (that is to say the plague)upon them.

In all this dreadful visitation there were,as I have said before,but two pest-houses made use of,viz.,one in the fields beyond Old Street and one in Westminster;neither was there any compulsion used in carrying people thither.Indeed there was no need of compulsion in the case,for there were thousands of poor distressed people who,having no help or conveniences or supplies but of charity,would have been very glad to have been carried thither and been taken care of;which,indeed,was the only thing that I think was wanting in the whole public management of the city,seeing nobody was here allowed to be brought to the pest-house but where money was given,or security for money,either at their introducing or upon their being cured and sent out -for very many were sent out again whole;and very good physicians were appointed to those places,so that many people did very well there,of which I shall make mention again.The principal sort of people sent thither were,as I have said,servants who got the distemper by going of errands to fetch necessaries to the families where they lived,and who in that case,if they came home sick,were removed to preserve the rest of the house;and they were so well looked after there in all the time of the visitation that there was but 156buried in all at the London pest-house,and 159at that of Westminster.

By having more pest-houses I am far from meaning a forcing all people into such places.Had the shutting up of houses been omitted and the sick hurried out of their dwellings to pest-houses,as some proposed,it seems,at that time as well as since,it would certainly have been much worse than it was.The very removing the sick would have been a spreading of the infection,and the rather because that removing could not effectually clear the house where the sick person was of the distemper;and the rest of the family,being then left at liberty,would certainly spread it among others.

The methods also in private families,which would have been universally used to have concealed the distemper and to have concealed the persons being sick,would have been such that the distemper would sometimes have seized a whole family before any visitors or examiners could have known of it.On the other hand,the prodigious numbers which would have been sick at a time would have exceeded all the capacity of public pest-houses to receive them,or of public officers to discover and remove them.