中国政务公开第三方评估报告·2017
上QQ阅读APP看书,第一时间看更新

项目组负责人:

田禾 中国社会科学院国家法治指数研究中心主任,法学研究所研究员、法治指数创新工程项目组首席研究员

吕艳滨 中国社会科学院国家法治指数研究中心副主任,法学研究所研究员、法治国情调研室主任

项目组成员:(按姓氏汉字笔画为序)

马效领 王洋  王展  王小梅 王述珊

王祎茗 王昱翰 毛宇翔 田纯才 冯天阳

冯迎迎 任昱希 向林  刘迪  刘雁鹏

阮雨晴 杨德世 金俊州 赵千羚 荆涵

胡昌明 侯冰洁 胥开文 栗燕杰 徐斌

黄恩浩 葛冰

主要执笔人:

吕艳滨 中国社会科学院法学研究所研究员

田禾 中国社会科学院法学研究所研究员

刘迪 中国社会科学院法学研究所研究助理

技术支持:

北京蓝太平洋科技股份有限公司

摘要:为分析政务公开工作进展及存在的问题,中国社会科学院国家法治指数研究中心、法学研究所法治指数创新工程项目组,围绕决策公开、管理服务公开、执行和结果公开、重点领域信息公开、政策解读与回应关切、依申请公开等方面,对2018年国家机构改革前的54家国务院部门、31家省级政府、49家较大的市政府和100家县级政府2017年政务公开工作开展第三方评估。评估发现,各级政府政务公开取得显著进步,如对本领域本地区政务公开工作指导成效明显,重大决策预公开水平明显提升,部分行政执法领域信息公开程度较高,部分领域的执行和结果公开相对规范,部分重点领域信息公开情况较好,政策解读与回应关切总体较好。但仍存在一些问题,如部分领域政务公开标准有待明确,部分基础性信息公开仍不到位,部分重点领域信息公开仍有提升空间,部分政务公开的新要求有待进一步落实,政策解读发布水平有待提升,依申请公开仍存法律风险,政务公开平台建设有待加强。对此,应树立政务公开的正确认识,理顺公开工作机制,注重总结和推广经验,注重处理好公开和不公开的关系,以大公开理念推动政务公开工作,加强政府网站的信息化建设。

关键词:政务公开 法治政府 政府透明度 法治指数

Abstract:To further promote the work of open government in China,National Research Centre on The Rule of Law Index and the project team on The Rule of Law Index of the Law Institute of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences carried out third-party assessment on the 2017 open government work on 54 departments under the State Council,31 provincial-level governments,49 larger cities and 100 county-level governments in such fields as openness in decision-making,openness in management and service,openness in implementation,openness in key areas,explanation of policies and response to public concerns,disclosure upon application.The assessment shows that China has made remarkable progress in the work of open government.For example,the guidance in specific fields and areas of open government achieved obvious effect; the transparency of decision-making has improved consistently; the degree of disclosure of information about administrative enforcement is high; the openness in some implementation fields is normative; the disclosure of information in some key areas is good; significant progresses have been made in the work of explanation of policies and response to public concerns.Meanwhile,the assessment also reveals some problems.For example,the standard of open government still need to be further elaborated on; the disclosure of some basic government information is not enough,more efforts need to be made in the disclosure of information in some key areas; some new requirements of open government need to be meet in further; the work of explanation of policies needs to be promoted; legal risk in the application for information disclosure still remains; more efforts need to be made in the construction of platform for the disclosure of information.In light of the above problems,the project team suggests that China should recognize the importance of open government; clearly define the open government mechanism; focus on summary and promotion of experience; handle the relationship of openness and confidentiality; promote the open government work with the “Great open” idea; strengthen the construction of government website informatization.

Key Words:Open Government;Government Ruled by Law;Government Transparency;The Rule of Law Index